Insights
The Shifting Bottleneck Conundrum: How AI Is Reshaping the Software Development Lifecycle
The impact of AI: Real gains or shifting bottlenecks?
The software development industry has witnessed an unprecedented transformation with the integration of artificial intelligence tools into the development lifecycle. GitHub's 2024 Developer Survey reveals that 87% of developers using AI coding assistants report significantly faster development cycles, with productivity gains of up to 41% on routine coding tasks [11]. Yet paradoxically, many organizations are discovering that accelerating one phase of development merely exposes or creates bottlenecks elsewhere in the pipeline.
This phenomenon, which I term "the shifting bottleneck paradox," represents one of the most critical challenges facing software engineering teams today. As Bain & Company's 2025 Technology Report notes, while two-thirds of software firms have rolled out generative AI tools, the reality is stark: teams using AI assistants see only 10% to 15% productivity boosts, and often the time saved isn't redirected toward higher-value work [4].
Research from GitHub has consistently demonstrated that AI-powered coding assistants can significantly improve developer efficiency at the individual level. A 2024 study published in Communications of the ACM by Ziegler et al. analyzed 2,631 survey responses from developers using GitHub Copilot and found that 73% reported staying in the flow state more effectively, while 87% preserved mental effort during repetitive tasks [1]. A case study from Zoom info involving over 400 developers showed an average acceptance rate of 33% for AI suggestions and 20% for lines of code, with developer satisfaction scores reaching 72% [7].
Research from the automotive industry published in the Americas Conference on Information Systems 2024 Proceedings demonstrated improvements across throughput, cycle time, code quality, defects, and developer satisfaction measures when using GitHub Copilot within the SPACE framework [6]. The study found that AI copilots showed greatest efficacy in software building tasks, with developers reporting 45% time savings in coding activities.
However, not all research paints such an optimistic picture. A groundbreaking study by METR (Model Evaluation and Threat Research) in July 2025 produced surprising findings that challenge the narrative of universal AI productivity gains [2]. The randomized controlled trial of early-2025 AI tools with experienced open-source developers found that when developers used AI tools, they took 19% longer to complete tasks compared to working without AI assistance.
This counterintuitive result highlights a critical insight: AI's impact on productivity is highly context-dependent. As the METR researchers note, AI tools may be most beneficial for less experienced developers or those working in unfamiliar codebases, rather than for experienced developers working in their own repositories [2]. This nuance is often lost in broad claims about AI productivity.
While AI has accelerated code generation, it has inadvertently created what our colleagues at LinearB describe as "AI dams" - points where human processes block the flow of AI-accelerated work [5]. Their 2024 analysis of 400+ development teams revealed a striking disparity: 67% of developers use AI for coding, yet merge approvals remain 77% human-controlled, with only 23% adoption of AI assistance.
As Suzie Prince from Atlassian observed during a recent industry webinar, "80% of coding time for a developer or the time that a developer spends is not coding. It's planning, it's documentation, it's reviews, it's maintenance." The irony is clear: the industry has optimized the 20% while the bottlenecks persist in the remaining 80%.
According to the State of Code Review 2024, the median engineer at a large company takes approximately 13 hours to merge a pull request, spending the majority of this time waiting on code review. A 2023 Stack Overflow Developer Survey found that developers spend roughly 15-20% of their time waiting for code reviews, with this number climbing even higher in teams with tight release schedules or large codebases.
The industry has responded with a proliferation of AI-powered code review tools. Research published in Medium by API4AI in May 2025 indicates that teams using AI-assisted code review tools report 30% faster merge request approvals, especially for small and medium-sized changes, with fewer back-and-forth review cycles and reduced load on senior engineers [13].
GitHub's own research from July 2025 reveals that developers who run AI-powered reviews before opening pull requests often eliminate entire classes of trivial issues, such as missing imports or inadequate tests, cutting back-and-forth iterations [12]. However, as GitHub's blog post "Code Review in the Age of AI" emphasizes, AI changes none of the fundamental accountability requirements - it merely moves the bottlenecks. The merge button still requires a developer's approval because AI cannot make nuanced decisions about privacy implications, technical debt pay down timing, or architectural trade-offs.
The acceleration of code generation through AI has reinforced the importance of shift-left testing - moving quality assurance earlier in the development lifecycle. According to Barry Boehm's seminal research, later validated in multiple contemporary studies, fixing a bug in production can cost up to 100 times more than addressing it during the requirements phase [16]. The Ponemon Institute's 2017 research found that vulnerabilities detected early in development cost approximately $80 on average, but the same vulnerabilities cost around $7,600 to fix if detected after moving into production [17].
The 2024 World Quality Report highlights that 72% of QA teams now integrate automation into their workflow alongside manual testing to enhance their capacity to deliver faster and more reliable results [15]. This integrated approach ensures that quality is embedded throughout the development lifecycle, aligning with the shift-left principle that aims to identify and address issues early in the process.
As AI accelerates individual coding productivity, the downstream pipeline must keep pace. Bain & Company's 2024 Technology Report emphasizes that broad AI adoption requires process changes: "If AI speeds up coding, then code review, integration, and release must speed up as well to avoid bottlenecks" [3]. Leading companies like Netflix and Intuit have recognized this and shifted testing and quality checks earlier using the "shifting left" approach to ensure that rapidly generated code isn't stuck waiting on slow tests.
Forrester's 2024 State of DevOps Report reveals that organizations leveraging AI in DevOps pipelines have reduced their release cycles by an average of 67% [10]. However, as reported in [5], low-impact areas in AI adoption tell a revealing story: security reviews hover at just 15% AI adoption due to risk concerns, while production debugging remains at 12% given its complexity.
Perhaps the most significant bottleneck isn't technical at all - it's human. At a Fortune dinner held in collaboration with AMD in May 2024, technology leaders agreed that AI is "developing faster than an individual or company's ability to adapt to it" [8]. One executive warned of "process growth pains and cycles of job displacement and creation that would require the most human of features: grace and dignity."
The group identified multiple bottleneck categories: regulatory bottlenecks as policymakers react, organizational bottlenecks as corporations cope, strategic bottlenecks as leaders plan, and technical bottlenecks. But the consensus was clear: the biggest bottleneck of all is human - the people operating the systems [8].
XB Software's July 2025 analysis notes that only 12% of business leaders surveyed by MIT report that generative AI has fundamentally transformed how their solutions are developed [9]. However, 38% believe that generative solutions will bring major changes to the software development lifecycle within the next one to three years, with an additional 31% anticipating transformative shifts over four to 10 years.
Microsoft research reveals that it can take 11 weeks for users to fully realize the satisfaction and productivity gains of using AI tools. This finding underscores the importance of proper enablement and training programs. Organizations must invest in teaching developers not just how to use AI tools, but how to integrate them effectively into existing workflows.
Forrester's 2024 survey reveals a critical insight: developers spend only about 24% of their time writing code [10]. The rest is devoted to essential tasks such as creating software designs, writing and running tests, debugging issues, and collaborating with stakeholders. These activities require critical thinking, creativity, and communication skills that current AI tools cannot replicate or replace.
The research in [5] identifies three distinct phases in the evolution of AI in software development:
Phase 1 (2021-2023): Individual Adoption
Developers adopted AI copilots and assistants with productivity gains remaining localized and no real process changes. Teams experienced isolated improvements, but systemic bottlenecks remained unchanged.
Phase 2 (2024-2025): Workflow Integration
Teams are connecting AI tools across workflows, introducing automated PR reviews, intelligent test generation, and smart deployments. This phase reveals the bottleneck-shifting phenomenon most acutely, as organizations discover that accelerating one stage exposes constraints elsewhere.
Phase 3 (2026 and beyond): AI-Native Development
Bain & Company's 2025 report describes this emerging phase as requiring companies to "frame their roadmap as an AI-native reinvention of the software development lifecycle" [4]. This involves designing processes from scratch with AI capabilities in mind, rather than retrofitting existing workflows.
The same research on enterprise adoption patterns reveals four distinct quadrants [5]:
AINewbie (50% of enterprises, 60% of startups)
These teams show minimal AI adoption with traditional workflows dominating. They might have GitHub Copilot licenses but manual processes control everything. They're stuck due to risk aversion, lack of DevEx support, and unclear ROI.
VibeCoder (16% of startups, rare in enterprises)
Heavy AI code generation meets traditional processes. Developers use Copilot extensively, but PRs still wait days for review. AI creates; humans slowly evaluate. These teams plateau because process bottlenecks negate generation speed, with warning signs including rising technical debt and reviewer burnout.
AI Orchestrator (fewer than 1% of startups)
This rare configuration maintains human-crafted code with AI-driven workflows. The emphasis is on process automation rather than code generation.
AI-Native(8% of enterprises with 300+ developers)
These organizations have achieved full integration, using AI throughout the development lifecycle with processes redesigned to accommodate AI capabilities.
Organizations achieving the highest gains from AI - up to 30% efficiency improvements according to Bain - take a comprehensive approach that goes beyond code generation [3]. Intuit's initiative to move from "scrappy testing" to scale development exemplifies this approach, focusing on increasing development velocity while leveraging generative AI benefits across the entire development platform.
The key dimensions include:
● Focusing on the right work that creates the most value
● Ensuring speedy, high-quality execution with full AI potential
● Optimizing resourcing costs across the development lifecycle
The average team uses 4.7 AI tools, but only 1.8 integrate with each other [5]. This creates "AI silos" where productivity gains in one area create bottlenecks in another. Smart teams solve this through API-first selection, workflow platforms to orchestrate tools, standard formats ensuring interoperability, and gradual rollout, integrating one stage at a time.
As AI reshapes the software development lifecycle, the focus on security and risk prediction is surpassing productivity gains as a top priority. Generative AI's growing influence on planning, coding, testing, and deployment introduces new challenges, especially as AI-driven reverse engineering and attack tools become increasingly sophisticated. The 2024 DORA report emphasizes the importance of tying engineering practices to user and business value, noting that AI appears in the toolchain, but value shows up only when practices, platforms, and metrics align.
The next wave of AI in software development - agentic or autonomous AI raises the stakes even higher. Bain's 2025 report notes that autonomous agents that can manage multiple steps of development with little to no human intervention are emerging [4]. Start-up Cognition introduced "Devin," an AI "software engineer," in 2024, that can build and troubleshoot applications from natural language prompts.
Vitor Monteiro from Poolside describes a roadmap evolving from today's code assistants to junior developers, eventually progressing to senior developers, and ultimately to autonomous development systems [19]. However, Poolside has identified two critical bottlenecks: compute power and data. With approximately 3 trillion tokens of source code available worldwide for training, all AI companies are working with the same limited dataset, driving innovation in synthetic data generation.
The integration of AI into the software development lifecycle represents a profound transformation, but not the simple productivity multiplier that early enthusiasts envisioned. Instead, we're witnessing a complex reordering of constraints and capabilities across the development pipeline.
The evidence is clear: AI excels at structured, repeatable tasks but struggles with nuanced decision-making. Success in this new landscape requires organizations to:
1. Think Holistically: Optimize the entire development pipeline, not just coding
2. Invest in People: Provide comprehensive training and enablement programs
3. Redesign Processes: Build AI-native workflows rather than retrofitting existing ones
4. Maintain Human Oversight: Preserve developer accountability for critical decisions
5. Integrate Tools: Ensure AI tools work together rather than creating new silos
As we move toward Phase 3 of AI evolution in software development, the winners will be organizations that recognize AI not as a magic bullet, but as a powerful tool that requires thoughtful integration into a reimagined development lifecycle. The bottlenecks will continue to shift, but with strategic planning and comprehensive process transformation, organizations can turn these challenges into competitive advantages.
The future of software development is neither purely human nor purely AI - it's a carefully orchestrated collaboration that amplifies human creativity and judgment while leveraging AI's speed and pattern recognition capabilities. Understanding and managing the shifting bottlenecks will be the defining challenge of software engineering leadership for the next decade.
————————
1. Ziegler, A., Kalliamvakou, E.,Li, X.A., Rice, A., Rifkin, D., Simister, S., Sittampalam, G., & Aftandilian, E. (2024). "Measuring GitHub Copilot's Impact on Productivity." Communications of the ACM, 67(3). https://cacm.acm.org/research/measuring-github-copilots-impact-on-productivity/
2. METR. (2025). "Measuring the Impact of Early-2025 AI on Experienced Open-Source Developer Productivity." https://metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early-2025-ai-experienced-os-dev-study/
3. Bain & Company. (2024)."Beyond Code Generation: More Efficient Software Development." Technology Report 2024. https://www.bain.com/insights/thriving-as-the-software-cycle-slows-tech-report-2024/
4. Bain & Company. (2025)."From Pilots to Payoff: Generative AI in Software Development." Technology Report 2025. https://www.bain.com/insights/from-pilots-to-payoff-generative-ai-in-software-development-technology-report-2025/
5. LinearB. (2024). "AI in Software Development: The Complete Guide to Tools, Productivity & Real ROI." https://linearb.io/blog/ai-in-software-development
6. Smit, D., Smuts, H., Louw, P., Pielmeier, J., & Eidelloth, C. (2024). "The Impact of GitHub Copilot on Developer Productivity from a Software Engineering Body of Knowledge Perspective." AMCIS 2024 Proceedings.https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2024/ai_aa/ai_aa/10/
7. Zoominfo. (2025)."Experience with GitHub Copilot for Developer Productivity at Zoominfo." arXiv. https://arxiv.org/html/2501.13282v1
8. Fortune. (2024). "AI's Biggest Bottlenecks, According to CIOs and CTOs." https://fortune.com/2024/05/01/ai-bottlenecks-regulatory-technical-organizational-strategic-humans/
9. XB Software. (2025)."Generative AI in Software Development: 2024 Trends & 2025 Predictions." https://xbsoftware.com/blog/ai-in-software-development/
10. Forrester. (2024). "State of DevOps Report."
11. GitHub. (2024). "Research: Quantifying GitHub Copilot's Impact on Developer Productivity and Happiness." https://github.blog/news-insights/research/research-quantifying-github-copilots-impact-on-developer-productivity-and-happiness/
12. GitHub. (2025). "Code Review in the Age of AI: Why Developers Will Always Own the Merge Button." https://github.blog/ai-and-ml/generative-ai/code-review-in-the-age-of-ai-why-developers-will-always-own-the-merge-button/
13. API4AI. (2025). "AI Code Review in DevOps Workflows." Medium. https://medium.com/@API4AI/ai-in-devops-enhancing-code-review-automation-55beb25111a8
14. CodeAnt AI. (2025). "AI Code Review Metrics That Reduce Backlog (Not Just Comments)." https://www.codeant.ai/blogs/ai-code-review-metrics-reduce-backlog
15. Capgemini, Sogeti, & Micro Focus. (2024). "World Quality Report."
16. Boehm, B. (1981). Software Engineering Economics. Prentice Hall.
17. Ponemon Institute. (2017). "The Cost of Software Vulnerabilities."
18. McKinsey & Company. (2024). "AI Adoption Survey."
19. Monteiro, V. (2024). "How Poolside Is Pursuing AGI for Software Development." AI-Pulse Conference.https://www.frenchtechjournal.com/ai-pulse-2024-how-poolside-is-pursuing-agi-for-software-development/
20. InformationWeek. (2025). "Breaking Through the AI Bottlenecks." https://www.informationweek.com/machine-learning-ai/breaking-through-the-ai-bottlenecks
.jpeg)